A Study of Long-Term Non-Monogamous Male Couples
©Tom Moon,
MFT, 2010
Blake
Spears and Lanz Lowen have been together for over 34 years. They
told me that they still have great sex, contradicting the common
belief that sexual interest inevitably wanes in a long-term relationship.
How do they do it? “One reason,” Lanz said, “is that
we’ve been in an open relationship from the very beginning. If
we hadn’t been open, we wouldn’t have been able to grow
individually or as a couple.” But, they write, this was a journey
they took “without a roadmap…Information about how couples
navigate this terrain is surprisingly lacking. We were curious about
the experience of others and assumed many long-term couples might offer
valuable perspectives and hard-earned lessons.” So, a few years
back, they decided to use their combined training and experience in
research and psychology to do an independent, in-depth study of other
long-term open gay male relationships. They wanted to provide the community
with an accurate picture of what non-monogamy actually looks like in
the lives of gay men. Their study has now been completed. It’s
an intimate look into the lives of 86 couples who have each been together
for a minimum of 8 years, and it can be accessed at www.thecouplesstudy.com.
This
study is a fascinating read because the authors largely avoid speculation
and let the participants speak for themselves. One finding that fascinated
me was the many varieties of “openness” that
the couples practiced. Some only played together, some only separately,
and some did both. Some only allowed anonymous outside encounters,
while others allowed “friends with benefits” and still
others built polyamorous families with multiple partners. Some (about
ten percent) had no rules at all governing outside sex, while at the
other end of the spectrum others created detailed ground rules and
contracts. Every imaginable kind of “openness” seemed to
work for someone.
The study
includes a brief summary of previous research on non-monogamy, in
which the authors report that “Most research shows that approximately
two-thirds of long-term male couples who have been together for five
years or more are honestly non-monogamous,” and that “Multiple
studies have found no differences in relationship quality or satisfaction
between samples of sexually exclusive and non-exclusive male couples.” Despite
those findings, Blake and Lanz had a hard time recruiting participants.
They had no trouble finding non-monogamous couples, but relatively
few who wanted to talk about it. One man who chose to participate said “Having
an open relationship feels like a funny way of being in the closet
again. Family and friends expect that we’re monogamous, and we
don’t tell them we’re not. It’s like a secret….In
our community and society, it feels like something huge isn’t
being talked about or studied or understood.”
It’s no wonder. Non-monogamous relationships may be common in
our community, but I still frequently hear gay men criticize them as
pathological, immature, and destructive. I’m sometimes confidently
assured, as if it’s self-evident, that open relationships are
less healthy, loving, responsible, or honest than monogamous relationships;
that if you’re having outside sex, something must be wrong with
the love or the communication in your partnership; that outside sex
causes you to lose your focus on one another other; and that once you “start
straying” it’s “the beginning of the end.”
Blake
and Lanz came to different conclusions. While they concede that “…we
had a study population skewed towards the positive,” they believe
their work shows that “... it is reasonable to conclude that
non-monogamy for gay male couples is a viable option. When partners
find enough common ground in their inclinations and perspectives toward
non-monogamy, sanctioned outside sex is a sustainable and satisfying
possibility. If a couple is willing to be forthright and to problem-solve
as needed, non-monogamy isn’t by nature de-stabilizing. In fact,
the results of this study would suggest the opposite – many study
couples said non-monogamy enabled them to stay together. The average
length of relationship for interviewed couples was 16 years – double
our minimum requirement. Given the difficulties we had in recruiting
participants, this figure suggests a positive correlation between longevity
and non-monogamy. At a minimum, it destroys the myth that opening the
relationship is the ‘beginning of the end’. “
On the
other hand “…for most couples, there was a price
of admission. Non-monogamy came with risks and required maintenance.” Most
participants found that making it work required “clarifying values
and making certain they are mutual; appreciating and accommodating
differences; holding steadfast to agreements and a commitment to honesty;
growing greater capacity to process and manage their own emotional
reactions; learning to voice their desires, concerns, and uncomfortable
feelings; becoming increasingly vulnerable, trusting, forgiving,
generous; partnering to constructively problem-solve and find resolution
for unforeseen and possibly highly charged issues.”
Wow!
That’s a tall order. As I read this, it occurred to me
that this may help explain why non-monogamy gets a bad rap from some
gay men. Too many of us go into open relationships expecting that it
will be a lot easier than monogamy, providing us, more or less effortlessly,
with “the best of both worlds.” That may be one of the
most important myths this study destroys. It provides a much-needed
dose of realism: successful open relationships require commitment,
patience, and hard work.